Miles and Snow’s Organizational Strategies
To succeed in any competition requires a strategy. It doesn’t particularly
matter where you are competing, or what you are competing in, you are going to
need a strategy if you are to come out on top.
That concept is true in sports, and it is certainly true in
business. Even companies with the best products in the world need a sound
strategy in order to make sure those products wind up in the hands of as many
consumers as possible. An organization without a clearly defined strategy is
destined to fail.
The ideas presented in this tool can be greatly helpful when trying to
ensure that all actions taken within an organization are working toward the
same desired result. If a company’s strategy does not make sense of the goals
that it has in place, it will be difficult to reach a satisfactory conclusion.
Miles and Snow identify four unique strategies that are used by
organizations. Below we will quickly look at each of these four, and what they
say about the underlying business.
Prospector
When an organization falls into the category of Prospector, they are
expected to consistently be on the forefront of innovation and development.
Rather than sitting still with products that have been previously developed and
taken to market, prospecting organizations are always seeking to create the
‘next big thing’.
Defender
As the name would indicate, this is an organization that is satisfied with
their current place in the market – and they are going to work hard to defend
it as the years go by. Instead of investing time and money into trying to
develop new products to take to the market, this kind of an organization is
going to sit back and reap the rewards of what they have already created.
It should be noted that a firm does not have to remain in just one of these
strategy categories for its entire existence. It is quite common for firms to
shift from one to the other as markets develop. Commonly, companies that were
once considered innovative in their space will slide gradually into defender
territory as less and less innovation is possible in their given market.
Understanding when and how to shift from one strategy to another is crucial if
profits and market share are to be maintained.
Analyzer
In many ways, organizations that land in the analyzer category are a blend
of the first two options on the list. These tend to be some of the biggest
companies around, as they have the capacity to both develop new technologies
and products as well as defend the market for those they have already created.
Reactor
The final category on the list, those firms that land in the reactor
category really have no one specific approach to their business. It should go
without saying that organizations generally do not want to fall into the
reactor class, as this means that they are simply trying to catch up with the
market as things change over time.
Taking
a reactive approach to business is how many large companies wind up losing
market share over time. Even businesses with great ideas, products, and
employees can wind up lagging behind if their management team takes a reactive
approach to their decision making. It is nearly inevitable that companies who
react to the market are going to be passed up by the organizations who
innovate, defend, or analyze successfully.
It is
important to know where your organization fits within this framework. Once you
have a clear picture of which of these four ways you are going to use to
compete in the market, you can then structure the design of your operations in
a way that will suit the strategy you have taken.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder
Not: Yalnızca bu blogun üyesi yorum gönderebilir.